![]() ![]() ![]() That said, I don’t see the benefit of handling massive amounts of data on a portable device and also the way the filesystem works isn’t convenient at all workflow wise although there have been improvements. Switching to ARM means they can design their own processors and are not dependent on Intel who is struggling to deliver on time year after year. Intel is on its last legs and Apple has a state of the art chip division that delivers the best mobile chips consistently. Also Apple is on its way to make the switch to ARM in the next 3 years or so… the writing is on the wall. IPad Pro beats a MacBook Air in performance and could run the application without issues. An iPad has nothing like the power necessary to make PhotoLab level corrections to images in a responsive way. They will only follow if DxO wins over most of the pro photography market.Īn emphatic downvote from me here. There’s a segment of people who just want what everyone else uses. The hardcore Adobe fanatics – it’s Adobe! – won’t ever be won over. There’s not much we can say in answer, except, yes, the noise tools are best of class and the design is really nice. In fact, one current review chases PhotoLab for the out of date colour tools. Right now if I or anyone else goes out to promote PhotoLab on DPreview for instance, anyone can answer: “Yes it’s great but it’s really slow on A7R III images” or “The noise reduction is superb but the colour tools are really weak in comparison to C1” or “Sadly, it’s slow on Mac, C1 flies”. It’s those photographers DxO needs to reach. There is a huge minority of photographers (more than enough to support PhotoLab) for whom the results – in an efficient and pleasant workflow – are the most important criteria for choosing RAW software. If PhotoLab yields the best images, maintains its very smooth workflow and becomes competitively fast DxO will flourish. If the core project does not get enough love (fortunately DxO is catching up with cameras and lenses), the core project will fall behind. Every extra project which DxO adds which does not substantially increase revenue compromises their ability to maintain the core project. They can hire a new building of people if they feel like it and not even feel the costs. The only barrier to Adobe adding an app or features is if they feel like it or not, there’s no financial barrier. The only iPad which could potentially run PhotoLab fluidly would be a top of the line iPad Pro. The latest iPad pro is extremely powerful and I think it has more than enough power for Photolab. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |